The development and design of new tanks were low on the list of priorities for the British and the Americans until they saw the success of the German model. Early tanks for the Allies had limited transverse movement for the turret, because their primary purpose was to serve as a gun platform for the infantry units coming behind them. Tanks could be used to open a hole in enemy lines, but the brunt of the fighting must be done by infantry units. The British and American militaries adopted a tank strategy that envisioned armored vehicles as infantry support units. It was during the period between world wars that tank strategies began to develop. Development of Tank Strategiesįirst seen on the battlefield in large numbers during World War I, tanks were used as a ram to break through enemy trenches or to provide a safe firing position for infantry support troops. Standing above the other changes, the reliance on armored warfare revolutionized the way nations prepared for and fought wars. Nuclear weapons became a reality and redefined the strategic toolbox available to military and political leaders. Planes elevated air superiority to a necessity for armies on the ground. Technology introduced new weapons to the battlefield, and old strategies were replaced to reflect the new situation. The Army will buy 504 of the new vehicles-about enough for eight battalions.World War II brought fundamental changes to the ways in which nations conduct wars. A third competitor, designed by SAIC, was not chosen to proceed in the competition. BAE will produce an updated version of the M8 Buford (see top), an air-droppable light tank the Army flirted with buying in the 1990s but ultimately cancelled. General Dynamics Land Systems’ vehicle is the Griffin, a modified version of the British Army’s new Ajax tracked reconnaissance vehicle equipped with a version of the M1A2 Abrams tank turret. light infantry primarily rely on anti-tank missiles and artillery to beat back enemy tanks and armored vehicles, and giving them vehicles of their own would bolster their firepower against a variety of threats. Army is willing to prepare for-is shifting away from the guerrilla wars of the 9/11 era to big power competition and preparation for the Army to fight full-scale land battles. The nature of warfare-or at least the wars the U.S. Unlike some defense programs, MPF is growing more relevant all the time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |